Debate Speech Outline: Daniel
Paull Government Whip
Purpose: To persuade the audience that Western Democracies
should significantly restrict abortion.
Central Idea: Abortion should be restricted.
I.
Attention Getter - Everything is all dark,
cosy, and warm. You are in the most comfortable environment you've ever known.
Everything is pure bliss as you are currently living in utopia. Then in one violent moment, you feel the
greatest amount of pain imaginable and you can see this blinding light and then
your limbs are ripped apart from your body and you are now struggling to
survive and then in one quick snap of a rubber band, it's all over. Your life
is done. Your only thought was 'Mummy, how could you do this to me'
II.
Aim - I will not be providing any
new material but rather summarizing what has been said in the debate about
abortion. I will re emphasize what my team has said and will explain why the
arguments in favor of this crime that the opposition has said are not
satisfactory.
III.
Defend the Extension offered
by the Member of Government.
A.
My
partner explained how we are not currently conserving the rights of babies in a
mother’s womb. At the moment we are giving the death penalty to innocent
people. How can anyone be ok with that?
B.
Refute
what the Member of Opposition said about this point of Mariah’s
C.
The
Member of Government also gave alternatives to abortion. One of the most
successful alternatives she explained was adoption.
D.
The
opposition brought up rape but why cant adoption work for such a person. A rape
victim who gave up her son for an open adoption was quoted as saying, “Brayden,
my birth son, is the most wonderful thing that has ever happened to me and to
so many other people -- especially his two thrilled new parents! This is why I
would do anything in the world to save every baby in this world! I was raped.
Yes. But he deserves to live!”
E.
Adoption
works for rape victims and actually can give them some joy after a hard time in
their life. Imagine being able to give so much joy to someone who has gone
through something so unimaginable. Many other rape victims have been reported
as having more of a hard time dealing with killing their child than actually
being raped.
IV.
Refute the extension offered
by the Member of Opposition
V.
Defend other members of
government and rebut against previous members if appropriate.
VI.
Summarize the debate from the
perspective of the Government side
A. The Prime Minister explained
how a fetus is human and they still have rights before they are born. She also
explained how abortion deprives the world of another human. What person would
ever say they wish they had been aborted? We all want a chance to live a
successful life in this world, but those who are being aborted never get this
chance.
B. The Deputy Prime Minister showed
how life starts at conception so abortion is murder. It is though we are giving
the death penalty to an innocent human. Is there a worse crime? He also
reminded us how all humans are equal no matter what state they are in.
C. The Member of Government showed
how hypocritical it is for doctors to be killing babies. People who take an
oath to save lives are now actively killing innocent children. She also gave
many alternatives to abortion, the most suitable being adoption. It is much
more healthy, fulfilling, and joyful to use adoption instead of abortion.
D. How can the killing of an
innocent human be allowed in this country that advertises opportunity for
everyone?
VII.
Closing Statement
A.
Our
arguments show that in all cases abortion is not the answer and that preserving
human life should always come first. Obviously the opposition could not provide
any adequate reasons for killing an innocent human being.
B.
Mr.
Speaker you have the opportunity to save thousands of lives and bring happiness
to many. I hope we have made this an easy decision.
Bibliography
1. "10 Abortion Arguments: 10 Arguments For Abortion,
10 Arguments Against Abortion." About.com Women's Issues.
N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Dec. 2012. <http://womensissues.about.com/od/reproductiverights/a/AbortionArgumen.htm>.
2. Messerli, Joe. "Should Abortion Be Banned
(Except in Special Circumstances Like Saving the Mother's Life)?" BalancedPolitics.org.
N.p., 01 July 2012. Web. 04 Dec. 2012. <http://www.balancedpolitics.org/abortion.htm>.
3. Slick, Matt. "A Logical Argument against
Abortion." CARM. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2012.
<http://carm.org/logical-argument-against-abortion>.
4. "10 Arguments in Favor of Pro-Choice Policy -
Amplify." Amplify A Project of Advocates for Youth. N.p., n.d. Web.
05 Dec. 2012.
<http://amplifyyourvoice.org/u/pheo152/2009/01/26/10-arguments-in-favor-of-prochoice-policy>.
5. Thompson, Steve.
"Abortion: Pro-Life Answers to Pro-Choice Arguments." Yahoo!
Contributor Network. N.p., 10 Aug. 2006. Web. 04 Dec. 2012.
<http://voices.yahoo.com/abortion-pro-life-answers-pro-choice-arguments-64802.html>.
6. "Choice Matters."
Choice Matters RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Dec. 2012.
<http://www.choicematters.org/legal-abortion-arguments-pro-con/>.
7. "Abortion Regrets | Abort73.com." Abortion
Regrets | Abort73.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 05 Dec. 2012.
<http://www.abort73.com/testimony/>
8. Kiessling,
Rebecca. “Pregnant by Rape Stories” Web. 05 Dec. 2012. <http://www.rebeccakiessling.com/PregnantByRape.html>.